- Knowledge Management
So is this qualification - Internal Communication Management PgDip - run jointly by Kingston University and Capita L&D, the future of L&D qualifications in an era of informal learning?
This item may have passed unnoticed, however, today I spotted another piece of junk mail that fed the same thoughts. The Internal Communications 2009* show boasts in the email (though not clearly on that link, but definitely on this PDF** ):
HR And Internal Communications DebateOf course, the fault with both of these departments as they are traditionally arranged is that they are concerned only with information travelling in one direction: top-down. And I hardly need invoke the names of those commentators who would have something to say about such things.
Should internal communications and HR be integrated? Speakers from the BBC internal communications and HR teams share how they are working together to deliver an Employee Value Proposition and Employer Brand.***
Adopting an informal learning pose and looking a little more closely at the course spec, alarms bells ring louder:
Each module consists of a workshop, including expert speakers and topical case studies where you will study the role of the internal communication manager, employment practices and the nature of information and communication.
You will explore the effects of internal communication on the organisation and the impact of organisational factors on internal communication. You will look at the strategies and policies needed to underpin internal communication objectives and actions. You will also learn how to measure the effectiveness of internal communications.
Nowhere does the description suggest that any part of the course may take into account the changed nature of modern communications, or communications systems. In fact, it sounds so wholly academic and divorced from actual work that the only thing the course appears to teach you that you may apply directly back in the workplace is the measurement of IC - the old ROI game that training departments spend a disproportionate amount of time trying to prove - using up resources that precisely undermine their own case.
To be fair, I'd hazard that more than 80% of internal communication in an organisation is informal and I suspect that it receives a whole lot less than 20% of the attention of qualified internal communications managers.
Does your organisation 'get' peer-to-peer communication? Are you still having to develop 'training' solutions that really aren't?
** Which you may care to look at if you really have nothing better to do with your time than wait for it to load. I really don't think these people haven't gotten over the age of print. But then, that's Hay Publishing through and thru.
*** I'm beginning to wonder if I've been too harsh. Surely this is the result of a faulty caps lock key?